PEAJEPS ISNI 0502828001 ISSN : 2789-1941
Vol 3, No9, AUGUST , pp -
46
)Palestinian Educators AssociationPEA Journal of Educational and Psychology Sciences (
:
( ):
( ):
Effectiveness of a Simulation-Based Learning
Environment in Science Subject in Procedural
Knowledge among Ninth Grade Students
1
( )
2
( )
3
( )
*
:
E-mail address:
College of Education, Islamic
University of Gaza
Maeah89@hotmail.com
:1
01.0
:
Effectiveness of a Simulation-Based Learning Environment in Science Subject in
Procedural Knowledge among Ninth Grade Students
Abstract:
Study aim: This study aimed to identify the effectiveness of a simulation-based learning environment in
procedural knowledge in science subject among ninth grade students. and the researcher adopted the
descriptive analytical and experimental approaches. And the study was applied on a sample of (62)
students, where (31) of them represented the experimental group (simulation-based learning
environment), and the other (31) represented the control group (traditional method). And the study tools
were represented in a test of conceptual knowledge and a test of procedural knowledge.
And Study results there are statistically significant differences at the level of (α=0.01) between the mean scores of
experimental group students and the mean scores of control group students in the post-application test of procedural
knowledge. The study recommended the need to train teachers on how to design and use simulation-based
educational environments and work with them in a good manner in education, and the need to use the virtual
laboratory as one of the simulation programs in teaching units related to chemistry.
Keywords(a simulation-based learning environment, procedural knowledge)
47
)Palestinian Educators Associationof Educational and Psychology Sciences ( PEA Journal
.
.
.
.
.
48
)Palestinian Educators Associationof Educational and Psychology Sciences ( PEA Journal
(Fulkert,
CNC
(0.05≥α
(Mahdizadeh.Et.al.2008)
.
.
conditioonalized
.
49
)Palestinian Educators Associationof Educational and Psychology Sciences ( PEA Journal
(Marazano.2000.p14)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
50
)Palestinian Educators Associationof Educational and Psychology Sciences ( PEA Journal
8
9
10
11
12
13
Cheng- Yaat .Et.al.2013
Darey.Et.al. 2012,
51
)Palestinian Educators Associationof Educational and Psychology Sciences ( PEA Journal
.Et.al.(Hallett
(0.05≥ α)
(0.05≥α)
1 2
1
2
3
52
)Palestinian Educators Associationof Educational and Psychology Sciences ( PEA Journal
1
2
1
2
:
53
)Palestinian Educators Associationof Educational and Psychology Sciences ( PEA Journal
1
2
3
54
)Palestinian Educators Associationof Educational and Psychology Sciences ( PEA Journal
4
5
6
7
55
)Palestinian Educators Associationof Educational and Psychology Sciences ( PEA Journal
8
10
)4545424240()3736363432(
9.38
9
10
56
)Palestinian Educators Associationof Educational and Psychology Sciences ( PEA Journal
1 :
2
:
sig
sig
sig
12
0.811
0.001
1
0.791
0.001
13
0.763
0.001
1
0.398
0.024
2
0.775
0.001
2
0.499
0.004
3
0.659
0.001
1
0.738
0.001
3
0.783
0.001
4
0.711
0.001
2
0.738
0.001
4
0.702
0.001
5
0.735
0.001
3
0.505
0.003
5
0.736
0.001
6
0.769
0.001
4
0.572
0.001
7
0.69
0.001
1
0.697
0.001
8
0.758
0.001
1
0.661
0.001
2
0.632
0.001
9
0.771
0.001
2
0.702
0.001
3
0.712
0.001
10
0.694
0.001
3
0.794
0.001
4
0.784
0.001
11
0.759
0.001
4
0.699
0.001
5
0.659
0.001
r
r
:
57
)Palestinian Educators Associationof Educational and Psychology Sciences ( PEA Journal
sig
r
r
1
22
12
2
SS
=2 ST
Guttman
2
1
S
2
2
S
2
ST
13
0.745
0.853
4
0.767
0.868
4
0.793
0.884
5
0.787
0.880
58
)Palestinian Educators Associationof Educational and Psychology Sciences ( PEA Journal
.
2 21 21
21
21
(0.821)
#
#
.1
0.55
0.65
.17
0.54
0.58
.2
0.59
0.45
.18
0.62
0.55
.3
0.40
0.48
.19
0.65
0.45
.4
0.65
0.51
.20
0.50
0.55
.5
0.50
0.63
.21
0.54
0.39
6
0.35
0.63
.22
0.62
0.58
.7
0.65
0.57
23
0.54
0.39
.8
0.50
0.48
24
0.65
0.57
.9
0.54
0.39
25
0.50
0.48
.10
0.62
0.58
26
0.54
0.39
59
)Palestinian Educators Associationof Educational and Psychology Sciences ( PEA Journal
.11
0.65
0.55
27
0.62
0.58
.12
0.50
0.45
28
0.65
0.55
.13
0.52
0.55
29
0.62
0.32
.14
0.42
0.60
30
0.39
0.48
.15
0.62
0.45
31
0.35
0.70
.16
0.39
0.48
0.541
0.516
.
:
t IndependentSamples t test
T
T
Sig
60
)Palestinian Educators Associationof Educational and Psychology Sciences ( PEA Journal
T
0.05
T
0.01
TT
0.05
Crocodile Chemistry 605 EG
:
"SPSS"Statistics Package For Social Science
:
–
. . . 21 .
: .
- :
(T-Test Independent Sample)
η2
61
)Palestinian Educators Associationof Educational and Psychology Sciences ( PEA Journal
:
05.0
05.0
Independent Samples t test
1 2 3
4 5
T
T
Sig
31
4
1.19
1.078
6.159
0.001
31
4
2.74
0.893
31
4
1.39
0.882
8.272
0.001
31
4
3.00
0.632
31
13
5.19
2.971
7.618
0.001
31
13
10.13
2.045
31
5
1.84
1.036
7.011
0.001
31
5
3.61
0.955
62
)Palestinian Educators Associationof Educational and Psychology Sciences ( PEA Journal
31
5
1.23
0.920
9.526
0.001
31
5
3.81
1.195
31
31
10.84
4.783
11.530
0.001
31
31
23.29
3.644
T
01.0
TT
01.0
01.0
01.0
01.0
01.0
01.0
2
d
2
d
63
)Palestinian Educators Associationof Educational and Psychology Sciences ( PEA Journal
2
d
2
d
7.011
9.526
11.530
2
d
(0.05≥α
64
)Palestinian Educators Associationof Educational and Psychology Sciences ( PEA Journal
65
)Palestinian Educators Associationof Educational and Psychology Sciences ( PEA Journal
CNC
.
66
)Palestinian Educators Associationof Educational and Psychology Sciences ( PEA Journal
Bayrak, C. (2008). Effects Of Computer Simulation Programs On University Studentsʼ
Achievments In Physics. Turkish Online Journal Of Distance Education-Tojde, 9 (4),
53-62.
Cheng-Yaa, L., Jerry, B., Der-Ching, Y. and Tsai-Wei, H. 2013. Preservice Teachers
Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge of Fraction Operation: A comparative Study of
the United State and Taiwan. School Science and Mathematics, 113 (1): 41-51
Darey, H., Terzinha, N., Peter, B. and Christina, T. 2012. Individual Differences in
Conceptual and Procedural Fraction Understanding: The Role of Abilities and School
Experience. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113 (4), 469-486.
Ding, Y., & Hao, F. (2009, March7-8). Using A Simulation Laboratory To Improve
Physics Learning: A Case Exploratory Learning Of Diffraction Grating. Paper presented
at the IEEE Computer Society As the first international workshop on education
technology and computer science, 3, 3-6.
Fulkert, R. (2000). Authentic assessment. In J. Rucker & R. Schoenrock (Eds.)
Assessment in business education. National Business Education Yearbook, No. 30, p.
71-90.
Hallett, D., Nunes, T. and Bryant, P. 2010. Individual differences in conceptual and
procedural knowledge when learning fractions. Journal of Education Psychology, 102
(2), 395-406
Mahdizadeh ,H. iBiemans ,H & Mulder ,M. (2008). Derermining factors of the use of e-
learning environments by university teachers. Computers and Education , 15 (1), 51-
142.
Marzano, R. (2000). Transforming classroom grading. Alexandria, VA: ASC.
67
)Palestinian Educators Associationof Educational and Psychology Sciences ( PEA Journal
